The human face is made up of over 40 muscles, many of which are responsible for the subtle expressions we use every day, like smiling, frowning, or squinting. Muscles such as the frontalis, orbicularis oculi, and zygomaticus major are often targeted in botulinum toxin treatments, where precise knowledge of anatomy is key to achieving natural-looking results.
Among the most popular botulinum toxin type A injectables are Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA), an FDA-approved product known for its consistent results, and Liztox, a high-purity Korean formulation from Huons Biopharma, valued for its affordability and its BioPure Extraction Process.
In this article, we’ll compare Liztox and Botox across three essential areas: safety, immunogenicity, and practitioner preference, to help clinicians make more informed decisions when choosing the best product for their aesthetic practices.
Key Takeaways
- Liztox and Botox are both botulinum toxin type A products used for wrinkle reduction and muscle relaxation, with Botox being the long-standing gold standard in the market and Liztox emerging as a cost-effective alternative.
- Liztox contains human serum albumin (USP grade) and sodium chloride as stabilizers, similar to Botox, with both products undergoing rigorous purification for safety and efficacy.
- Botox has been a trusted choice globally, with decades of use and broad FDA approvals, while Liztox has a 99.8% purity and is gaining popularity, especially in Asian markets, due to its affordability and modern formulation.
- Both products show similar clinical effectiveness, with results typically lasting 3–5 months, depending on muscle activity, dosage, and metabolism.
- Liztox may have a slightly faster onset according to some anecdotal reports, but clinical studies have not confirmed a significant difference in speed compared to Botox.
- Safety profiles for both Liztox and Botox are comparable, with mild side effects like redness, swelling, or temporary muscle weakness being the most common and serious adverse events being rare when administered by trained professionals.
About: Medical Spa RX provides medical practices with premium products at the best prices. If you’re looking to buy Liztox online for your practice, the sales representatives at Medical Spa RX can give you guidance.
Manufacturer Background and Market Positioning
Botox, developed by Allergan (now part of AbbVie), has been the global leader in the botulinum toxin market since the late 1990s. Its extensive clinical history, multiple FDA approvals, and widespread brand recognition have cemented Botox as the gold standard in both aesthetic and therapeutic applications.

On the other hand, Liztox, produced by Huons Biopharma, is a newer entrant that seeks to offer comparable efficacy at a more accessible price point. With its modern manufacturing techniques and growing clinical presence, Liztox has carved out a space in the market, especially among practitioners who are looking for cost-effective alternatives without compromising on safety or performance.
While Botox continues to hold its premium legacy status, Liztox positions itself as a disruptive, value-driven option, reshaping market dynamics by focusing on affordability while maintaining competitive quality.
Both products are highly respected in the industry, but practitioners may consider factors like cost, availability, and personal preference when choosing between them. For example, in the Liztox vs Botulax comparison, similar considerations regarding affordability and clinical outcomes come into play, further highlighting how market demands are shifting towards value-conscious choices.
Formulation, Purity, and Protein Load Differences
Although both Liztox and Botox are botulinum toxin type A injectables, their formulations have some subtle differences that may influence clinical perception and marketing. These distinctions are often more critical to the manufacturers than to everyday clinical outcomes, but they’re still worth noting:
- Core Neurotoxin: Both Liztox and Botox contain purified botulinum toxin type A, which is responsible for muscle relaxation and wrinkle reduction.
- Stabilizers: Liztox contains human serum albumin (USP grade) and sodium chloride as stabilizers, which is similar to the composition in Botox. There is no evidence to suggest that Liztox uses bovine or plant-derived stabilizers in its marketed formulations.
- Buffer Composition: Both products include sodium chloride in their formulations, although Liztox does not have publicly available data confirming any unique buffer agents beyond this. Claims about altered solubility and reconstitution behavior should be framed as possible rather than definitive.
- Protein Load: Botox has a defined protein load, while Liztox may promote a lower total protein content to reduce the risk of immunogenicity. This is generally seen as a theoretical advantage, although both products show low rates of clinically relevant neutralizing antibodies when used appropriately.
- Complexing Proteins: Liztox may have fewer accessory proteins, marketed as having “lower antigenicity,” which theoretically could reduce the risk of an immune response. However, in practice, both products maintain low immunogenicity and excellent safety records when administered correctly.
- Purification Standards: Both Liztox and Botox undergo rigorous purification processes, ensuring that the final product meets clinical-grade safety and consistency.
In clinical practice, these subtle differences in formulation do not typically impact efficacy or safety. Most of the variations are more relevant to the manufacturers and may not significantly alter the overall patient experience or treatment outcomes.
Clinical Effectiveness, Onset, and Longevity
Both Liztox and Botox demonstrate comparable clinical effectiveness when administered at equivalent doses by trained professionals. Both products show reliable results for wrinkle reduction, muscle relaxation, and facial lifting.

- Onset: Most patients begin to see results from both Liztox and Botox within 2 to 5 days after injection, with full effect typically visible by two weeks. While some anecdotal reports suggest that Liztox may have a slightly faster onset than Botox, controlled trials have not shown a significant difference in this regard.
- Longevity: The duration of effect for both products typically ranges from 3 to 5 months, depending on factors like dosage, treatment area, and patient metabolism. Some Liztox reviews suggest that the product may last slightly longer for certain patients, but the 3 to 4 months range is typical for both injectables. This is similar to the duration seen in studies with Botox.
A Phase 3 clinical trial found Liztox to be non-inferior to Botox in therapeutic applications, showing similar efficacy and safety outcomes for muscle spasticity. This finding adds to the growing body of evidence supporting Liztox as a reliable and effective alternative to Botox in both aesthetic and therapeutic settings.
Safety, Immunogenicity, and Practitioner Preference
Liztox and Botox are injectables used in aesthetic medicine. Comparing these botulinum toxins, such as Liztox vs Botulax, reveals differences in safety data, immunogenicity potential, and practitioner preferences. These can influence product selection and patient outcomes.
Feature | Liztox | Botox |
Safety | Demonstrates a favorable safety profile in studies. | Extensive global safety data and FDA approvals. |
Immunogenicity | Low protein load via purification may reduce risk. | Proven low immunogenicity over decades of use. |
Clinical History | Newer product, primarily used in Asian markets. | Long-standing use worldwide with broad indications. |
Practitioner Preference | Gaining popularity for affordability and efficacy. | Preferred for reliability, consistency, and trust. |
Liztox is emerging as a cost-effective alternative with promising clinical data, particularly in Korea and Southeast Asia. It’s seen as a great option for those looking for an affordable solution without compromising on performance.
In contrast, Botox remains the benchmark. It has decades of experience and broad FDA approval for a range of applications, making it the trusted choice for many practitioners worldwide.
Conclusion
In the Liztox vs Botox comparison, both products are highly effective botulinum toxin type A injectables. The both of them can provide reliable results in wrinkle smoothing and muscle relaxation. While Botox maintains its legacy status, backed by years of clinical validation and FDA approvals, Liztox has emerged as a strong, cost-effective alternative, with a streamlined formulation and modern manufacturing processes.
The choice between Liztox and Botox ultimately depends on factors like cost, provider experience, and patient preferences. While both injectables offer similar safety and efficacy, skilled technique and proper dosing remain crucial to achieving optimal results.
FAQs
1. What is Liztox and how does it differ from Botox?
Liztox is a botulinum toxin type A product similar to Botox. It is marketed as a modern, budget-friendly alternative with slight differences in excipients and purification.
2. Is Liztox FDA-approved like Botox?
Liztox is not FDA-approved as of 2025. It may be approved in limited jurisdictions, so it’s important to check local regulatory approvals.
3. Are results with Liztox as long-lasting as Botox?
Yes, both typically offer results lasting 3–5 months, though individual variations may occur based on muscle activity and metabolism.
4. Does Liztox act faster than Botox?
Some reports suggest Liztox may act slightly faster, but controlled clinical studies have not confirmed a significant difference.
5. Is Liztox safer or less immunogenic than Botox?
Both have excellent safety records. While Liztox may have slightly lower protein impurities, immunogenicity is rare with either when used properly.
6. Can I switch from Botox to Liztox?
Yes, patients can transition between products, but it’s advisable to inform the provider of past treatments for appropriate adjustments.
7. How do I choose between Liztox and Botox?
Consider cost, provider experience, availability, and whether you prefer a long-standing brand (Botox) or a more affordable alternative (Liztox).
References
Scheve T. How many muscles does it take to smile? HowStuffWorks. Published April 8, 2021. https://science.howstuffworks.com/life/inside-the-mind/emotions/muscles-smile.htm
D’Souza A, Ng CL. Applied anatomy for botulinum toxin injection in cosmetic interventions. Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports. 2020;8(4):336-343. doi:10.1007/s40136-020-00308-4
Botulinum toxin. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://www.plasticsurgery.org/cosmetic-procedures/botulinum-toxin