The Body Mass Index (BMI) is a widely used measurement to assess body weight, with values of 25 or higher classified as overweight, and 30 or above indicating obesity. These categories often align with increased fat accumulation in areas like the abdomen, chin, and thighs, which are notoriously resistant to diet and exercise alone. For many, these stubborn fat deposits can be frustratingly persistent.
To address this issue, injectable treatments like Aqualyx and Kybella have emerged as popular alternatives to invasive procedures such as liposuction. While both treatments are designed to target and dissolve localized fat, they differ in key aspects such as formulation, approval status, and ideal treatment zones.
In this article, we will delve into a detailed comparison of Aqualyx vs Kybella, exploring how each works, highlighting their differences, and providing before-and-after photo examples to help you make an informed decision about the right treatment for your needs.
Key Takeaways
- Aqualyx and Kybella are both injectable treatments that target localized fat to provide non-surgical fat reduction.
- Kybella has FDA approval and specifically targets submental fat under the chin. In contrast, Aqualyx has CE certification and used off-label for a broader range of areas, including arms, abdomen, thighs, and inner knees.
- Both treatments utilize deoxycholic acid to break down fat. However, Aqualyx has a gentler formulation, making it ideal for larger areas or multiple zones, whereas Kybella is stronger and offers faster results in smaller areas, such as the chin.
- Aqualyx requires 3–8 sessions, with results appearing after 6–8 weeks, whereas Kybella typically requires 2–4 sessions, with results visible in 4–6 weeks.
- Side effects for both treatments are similar, including swelling, tenderness, and bruising, but Kybella may cause more intense inflammation, while Aqualyx generally has a quicker recovery time.
- Aqualyx offers a gradual fat reduction process, making it suitable for those who prefer a more subtle change. In contrast, Kybella is ideal for faster and more noticeable improvements in smaller, more defined areas.
- Both treatments offer permanent results as long as the patient maintains their weight, but Aqualyx may be a better option for those seeking a gentler approach to contouring larger areas.
About: Medical Spa RX provides medical practices with premium products at the best prices. If you’re looking to buy Aqualyx online for your practice, the sales representatives at Medical Spa RX can give you guidance.
Active Ingredients and Mechanism Comparison
Both Aqualyx and Kybella use deoxycholic acid to break down fat cells, but the formulations differ significantly in their approach and effectiveness.
Kybella utilizes a purified, synthetic form of deoxycholic acid, specifically designed to disrupt fat cell membranes. It acts aggressively on fat cells, triggering inflammation that leads to fat clearance through the lymphatic system.
Meanwhile, Aqualyx uses a buffered formulation suspended in a gel-like matrix that helps to reduce tissue irritation and inflammation. The gel allows Aqualyx to act more gradually, making it ideal for body contouring.
Key Differences
- Kybella: Directly disrupts fat cell membranes, triggering inflammation that eventually leads to fat clearing out through lymphatic drainage.
- Aqualyx: Uses its gel-like matrix to act more gradually and with reduced inflammation, making it ideal for broader treatment areas.
While both products rely on a similar fat-dissolving mechanism, Kybella’s higher purity causes stronger responses, making it particularly effective for small, localized areas. However, this may also result in more discomfort.
On the other hand, Aqualyx offers a gentler approach, making it better suited for larger or multiple treatment zones, especially in patients with lower pain tolerance.
Treatment Areas and Versatility
A major distinction between Aqualyx and Kybella lies in the approved treatment zones and overall versatility. Kybella has FDA approval for targeting submental fat under the chin, making it the preferred treatment in the United States for reducing double chin fat.
In comparison, Aqualyx holds CE certification and practitioners use them off-label across Europe and other regions for a broader range of body areas. It targets regions like the chin, jawline, upper arms, abdomen, thighs, hips, and even inner knees.
Aqualyx‘s gentler formulation and relatively lower session cost make it ideal for treating multiple zones or larger areas. Kybella remains the go-to treatment since it has FDA approval, but Aqualyx is often favored for its versatility and ability to target multiple body areas at once.
Onset of Results and Duration of Effect
Both Aqualyx and Kybella provide permanent fat reduction, but their timelines and follow-up needs vary. Some treatment areas will show visible results within weeks, while others may require multiple sessions and occasional touch-ups.
Kybella
- Results typically appear in 4–6 weeks after each session.
- Most patients need 2–4 sessions spaced 4–6 weeks apart.
- Permanent fat loss, though weight gain can alter appearance.
Aqualyx
- Results typically begin to show after 6–8 weeks, although this may take longer in some cases.
- Requires 3–8 sessions, depending on area and fat volume.
- Additionally, this is permanent if the patient maintains their weight.
While Kybella offers quicker visible results in small areas, such as the chin, its formulation makes it a better choice for localized fat pockets. Aqualyx, though slower, may work best for gradual reshaping, especially in sensitive areas or where a patient may need more extensive fat reduction.
Tolerability, Downtime, and Side Effects
Both Aqualyx and Kybella may cause swelling, tenderness, and bruising after the injection. However, Kybella’s potent formula and its focus on smaller, more tightly packed fat areas, such as the chin, typically result in more pronounced inflammation compared to Aqualyx, which can be applied to broader treatment zones with less initial swelling.
Kybella Side Effects
- Significant swelling and bruising for up to 1–2 weeks.
- Redness, hardness, or nodules under the skin.
- Risk of nerve injury in rare cases.
Aqualyx Side Effects
- Mild to moderate swelling for 3–7 days.
- Local tenderness, itching, or warmth.
- Rare cases of allergic reactions or skin firmness.
Many patients who review Aqualyx before and after results report experiencing less discomfort and a faster recovery in larger treated zones compared to the more intense Kybella treatment.
Conclusion
The choice between Aqualyx and Kybella depends on the patient’s specific treatment goals, target areas, and pain tolerance.
Kybella is FDA-approved and best suited for small, localized fat areas, offering faster results but requiring more downtime. On the other hand, Aqualyx, widely used in Europe, is more suitable for larger or multiple treatment zones, offering a gradual fat reduction with a gentler response.
By evaluating patient needs and anatomical areas, practitioners can tailor their treatment approach to ensure the safest and most effective results.
FAQs
1. How many Aqualyx sessions are needed?
Most patients require 3 to 8 sessions, spaced approximately 4 weeks apart, depending on the area and the amount of fat to be removed.
2. Is Aqualyx treatment painful?
Aqualyx can cause mild stinging or burning. Practitioners often use lidocaine to reduce discomfort during injection.
3. How long does swelling last after Aqualyx?
Swelling usually peaks within 24–48 hours and subsides in about 3 to 7 days post-treatment.
4. Is Aqualyx suitable for facial fat reduction?
Yes, it is commonly used for the chin and jowls, but it must be performed by a trained professional for safety.
5. Can Aqualyx be used on the abdomen?
Yes, Aqualyx can target areas like the abdomen, flanks, and love handles as part of body contouring.
6. Is the fat loss from Aqualyx permanent?
Yes, the fat cells destroyed by Aqualyx do not return. Maintaining a stable weight helps preserve the results.
7. Are there any people who shouldn’t use Aqualyx?
Aqualyx is not recommended for pregnant women, breastfeeding mothers, or individuals with severe liver/kidney disease.
References
Adult BMI categories. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Published March 19, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/bmi/adult-calculator/bmi-categories.html
Markell D, Peterson D. Body Fat Distribution. Pressbooks.pub. Published September 4, 2019. https://mhcc.pressbooks.pub/hpe295/chapter/body-fat-distribution/
